|
內容簡介: |
《红楼梦》被认为是中国*文学成就的古典小说,国内外研究甚多。本书从移情视角来分析研究《红楼梦》不同译本中有关其诗歌翻译的特点和规律。
本书从以下三个方面来阐述不同移情方式的差异:一是理论来源目的论、阐释学和解构主义。这三个理论为不同的移情法提供了理论上的支持。二是诗歌本身的特点,中文诗歌形式的生动性、简约性和含蓄性给拓展性阐释提供了客观语言基础,为多种翻译提供了可能条件。三是翻译的主观性。承认这种主观性不是对翻译客观性的否定,而是一种对翻译主观性的辩证态度。
|
關於作者: |
李虹,女,广州航海学院外语学院教授,博士。长期从事翻译的研究和教学工作。其主持的人才国际化与大学英语立体化教学体系构建研究获广东省省级教学研究和教学改革项目立项,《叙事视角下的翻译识解》等多篇论文在国家重点期刊发表。
|
目錄:
|
Contents
Introduction 001
Chapter One Literature Review 006
1.1 Definition of empathy 006
1.2 A comparison between Chinese and Western empathy 019
1.3 Previous studies on poetry translation in Hongloumeng 022
Chapter Two Poetry and Poetry Translation 030
2.1 The definition of poetry 030
2.2 The three basic elements of poetry 032
2.3 Text types and translation emphases 035
2.4 The translatability of poetry 038
2.5 Basic issues for poetry translation 050
Chapter Three Application of the Approach of Empathy in Poetry
Translation057
3.1 Difficulties of poetry translation 057
3.2 Reasons for application of the approach of empathy in poetry
translation 074
3.3 Empathetic obstacles in translation 086
Chapter Four Comparison of Aesthetic Empathy in Poetry Transla?
tion in Hongloumeng 089
4.1 Hongloumeng and its two translated versions 089
4.2 Comparison of aesthetic empathy 096
Chapter Five Comparison of Cultural Empathy in Poetry Transla
tion in Hongloumeng 140
5.1 Culture, language, translation and their mutual relationship 141
5.2 Application of the approach of cultural empathy
in literary translation 144
5.3 Realization of the approach of cultural empathy in literary translation
148
5.4 Comparison of cultural empathy in poetry translation in
Hongloumeng 152
Chapter Six Comparison of Pragmatic Empathy in Poetry Translation in Hongloumeng 189
6.1 Theory of pragmatic empathy 189
6.2 Comparison of pragmatic empathy 192
Chapter Seven Possible Explanations for Two Empathetic
Approaches: Empathy to ST and the Author v.s. Empathy to TT and
Readers 197
7.1 Theoretic explanations of empathy 198
7.2 Features of Chinese poetic language that allow for expansion215
7.3 Subjectivityas an undeniable fact 225
Conclusion236
Bibliography 241
|
|