《东亚应用伦理学的实践路径：第五届东亚应用伦理与应用哲学国际会议文集=Research on Practice Route of Applied Ethics in East Asia：英文》适合国内外应用伦理研究者、哲学类高校教师、交叉学科理论研究人员，以及关心应用伦理发展的公众、媒体人员、理论工作者参考阅读。
目錄：
Session One: Environmental Ethics and Applied Ethics
Two Sorts of Skepticism: Ethical Debates between Evolutionism and Creationism Yuann Jeu-jeuq3
Research on the Practical Approach of "Responsible Innovation Yan Ping， Wang Qian17
Whitehead''s Philosophy of Organism and Ecological Thought Hirofumi Oka 31
Environmental Aesthetics from Schelling''s Theory of Landscape Yahata Sakura 42
Ethical Responsibility in the Philosophy of Technology Pirozhnikava Viktoryia， Hong Xiao nan 52
Session Two: Ethics of Science and Technology
Ethics for Public Health from theView Point of Advocacy Matsuda Tsuyoshi 65
Is Scientificity Moral Virtue? -From a Rortian Perspective Ma Li， Hong Xiaonan 76
The Ideology Issue in Habermas'' Science and Technology Ethics Wang Wenjing， Hong Xiaonan89
The Ethical Challenge of Synthetic Biology Ma Shiwen， Wang Guoyu， Yang Jun 102
Theories and Practices of a Global Information Ethics-From a Perspective of PluralismLiLiangyu， Zheng Baozhang， He Mia0 113
Session Three: Moral Philosophy andIts Practical Appliccrtion
Love Becoming Reason: Hegel''s Concept of Reason andChristian Love Yang Chih-Sheng 127
The Emergence of Moral Cosmopolitanism in a Globalizing World:
Limitations and Possibilities in Issues of Migration
From Revenge to Forgiveness: Examining Forgiving Behaviors Based on Parfit''s View Liou Hsu-Nan 150
The Alleged Accountfor Sentimentalism from Empathy Liao Keng-Yu 157
Session Four: Historic-Cultura Resources and Applied Ethics in East Asia
Confronting Empires: Manhae''s Understanding of Buddhism Huh Woo Sung 167
Reconstruction of the Open Society Han Goo Lee 180
No Essentially Good Or Evil Act: Based on Buddhist Philosophy Cheng Kang 190
A Reason Why We Should Reveal Ourselves: An Insight from
JiKang''s "Gong" Lin Wan-Ching 199
Session Five: Methodologies in Applied Ethics and Applied Philosophy
Bio-Politics over Radiation: From Hiroshima， Chernobyl to FukushimaKazashi Nobuo 213
Genetically Modified Organisms GMO and Food Security in Africa Mnaranara Theresia E，Wang Guoyu，Zhang Jing 223
Africa Mnaranara Theresia E， Wang Guoyu， Zhang Jing 223
Ethical issues of Genetically Modified Crops: A Pakistani perspectiveHassan Nazia， Wang Guoyu， Zhang Jing， Amin Muhammad 233
How the Living Can Face the Deceased: The Work of Mourning Akiko Okubori 242
Session Six: Chinese Philosophy and
Ethics of TechnologyResearch on the Ethics of Responsibility from the Perspective of Comparative Philosophy Yu Xue， Wang Qian 255
On Zhuangzi and Moral Imagination Hsu Chia-Yu 269
The Technicalization and Saving of Play Zheng Yanyan，Wen Chengwei 280
Ming Confucian Liu Zongzhou on "Correcting Errors" Chou Yung-Sheng 290
內容試閱：
Session One：Environmental Ethics and Applied Ethics
Research on Practice Route of Applied Ethics in East Asia
Two Sorts of Skepticism：Ethical Debates between Evolutionism and Creationism
Two Sorts of Skepticism：
Ethical Debates between Evolutionism and Creationism
Yuann Jeu Jenq
Department of Philosophy，Taiwan University
1.Introduction
With the rise of modern science，many religious ideas have been cast in doubt.Among these ideas，creationism with all the ideas it implies，was most targeted by the modern theory of evolution.This is possibly the most famous debate in the historical development of modern science.The debate boils down to the status of human beings and the significance of their life.Whether man is on the side of“an improved ape”or the side of“an angel to be improved”raises the attention of all people who care themselves and the world in which they are situated.Never before has scientific development caused such a tremendous anxiety.For the first time，for many at least，the meaning of life is fundamentally challenged with a reprehensible feeling.In face of the invincible power of modern science，not only the core position of humans in the universe is annihilated，but also in jeopardy the very notion of being‘rational animals’.Bowler explicitly says：“Reconciliation of evolution with traditional concepts of teleology and design became the chief aim of religious thinkers who tried to grapple with Darwin s theory”.Bowler P.Evolution：The History of an Idea.Berkeley and Los Angeles：University of California Press，1984：206.
What raises our attention in this debate is not what ends the debate，but what causes it.We intend to argue in this paper that in the debate between creationism and evolutionism，there was never any convincing idea explaining that the traditionally religious idea needs to be replaced with the newly developed theory of evolutionIt is well known that even Darwin himself“could not adjust fully to the prospect of totally meaningless universe”. Ibid：230 We want to stress instead that the debate is an ongoing one without decisive conclusion.The indecisiveness is reasonable as neither side contains well founded reasons to stop the debate.Moreover，it is likely to say that both sides hold their reasons not from firm basis of any kind，but presuppositions of metaphysical kind.We can boldly say both sides come to the debate with their presuppositions.While the presupposition of the creationism refers to a transcendentally intelligible being，the presupposition of evolutionism refers to a presumed materialism.As we all know that there is no possibility of comparing two metaphysical presuppositions，the answer to the debate is hence an indecisive one.Or，it all depends on the reasons of conviction rather than that of prescription.
In what follows，the argument of this paper is divided into three parts.We will begin with the analysis of the debate s ethical dimension，and our attention concentrates on the origin of our moral consciousnessSection 2.Then，we will stress the futility of holding materialism as the cornerstone of modern science，especially its repudiating force of refuting traditional ideas in general and that of religion in particularSection 3.After exposing the failure of the materialistic presumption，we intend to argue further that there is practically no possibility to comprehensively explain the origin of our moral consciousness，let alone from an evolutionary point of viewSection 4.Furthermore，with the previous arguments，we conclude that some presumptions of transcendental ideas are necessary to be incorporated into a full understanding of the very existence of moral consciousness.This paper finally stresses that a more tolerant attitude towards the debate is helpful for the further inquiry of science.
2.The Debates Ethical Dimension
It is not an overstatement to say that the most prominent debates between creationism and evolutionism concentrate on the problem of the origin of morality.For some reasons nobody knows exactly，the evolutionist side gets the upper hand in these debates.It appears even reluctantly on the other side to react.The reluctance means hardly different from an unreserved concession of secularized human image and a total suspension of its distinctness among all species.If it were not because of this‘unbalanced’condition，creationism might not be able to find its chance of vindicating its intelligibilityMurphy N.and Schloss J.says：“Although this\[the evolutionally challenged origin of morality\]was recognized early on as one of the most important implications of Darwin s theory，there has been surprisingly little recent engagement by religious thinkers with emerging ideas of and attending controversies over evolutionary ethics”.This‘surprise’initiates the main ideas contained in this paper.Murphy N，Schloss J.Biology and Religion.In Rosenberg A，Robert A.eds.Philosophy of Biology：An Anthology.Oxford：Wiley Blackwell.2010:540 This is by no means an exaggeration as we all
購物車/收銀台(
0
) | 在線留言板
| 付款方式
| 聯絡我們
| 運費計算
| 幫助中心 |
加入書簽
HOME
新書上架
