|
內容簡介: |
《功能语言学年度评论(第4卷)》主要内容包括:Editors''Introduction:"BroadeningthePath"intheChineseContext、ExploringPatternsofConjunctioninDifferentRegisters:AChallengefromSFLforCorpusLinguists、ProblemsandSolutionsinIdentifyingProcessesandParticipantRolesinDiscourseAnalysis等。
|
目錄:
|
Editors''Introduction:"BroadeningthePath"intheChineseContext
ExploringPatternsofConjunctioninDifferentRegisters:AChallengefromSFLforCorpusLinguists
ProblemsandSolutionsinIdentifyingProcessesandParticipantRolesinDiscourseAnalysis
Part2:HowtoHandleMetaphor,IdiomandSixOtherProblems
ATypologicalPerspectiveonRelationsbetweenGenresinPopularScience
AFunctionalExplorationoftheIt-EvaluativeConstruction
SystemicFunctionalResearchinChina(2011):AnAnnotatedBibliography
《功能语言学年度评论》稿约
AbstractsofPapers
|
內容試閱:
|
Therearefourpapersinthepresentvolume.Thefirstpaperisentitled"Exploringpatternsofconjunctionindifferentregisters:AchallengefromSFLforcorpuslinguists",byGeoffThompson.Theauthorarguesthat"anSFLapproachsuggestsstronglythatitmaybetimeforcorpuslinguisticstoacceptthatatpresentitisbothliberatedandlimitedbyitsmethodology",whichechoesHalliday''s(2008:75)assertion:"Corpuslinguistshaveaskedustoworktowards''corpus-basedgrammars'';inordertobeabletodothiswehavetoaskthem,inturn,toworktowardsagrammar-basedcorpus."
ThesecondpaperisPart2ofthepaperentitled"ProblemsandsolutionsinidentifyingProcessesandParticipantRolesindiscourseanalysis"byRobinP.Fawcett,withitsfocusonhowtohandlemetaphor,idiomandotherproblems.Thefirstpartofthepaperwaspublishedinvolume3(Fawcett2011).Therelationshipbetweenthetwopartsisclearlyexplainedbytheauthorinthepresentpart.ThefocusofFawcett''spaperisonidentifyingProcessesandParticipantRolesindiscourseanalysisingeneralandon"differentproblemsthatariseintheanalysisofTRANSITIVITY"andthe"problemsthatneedtobehandledwithinaframeworkthatisabletomodelhowweusebothfreshmetaphorsandlong-establishedidiomsinasynchronicmodeloflanguageanditsuse"inparticular.Theunderlyingaimistodemonstrate"acognitive-interactivemodelofcommunicationthroughlanguage"withinthegeneralframeworkofSFL.TheauthorarguesthattheCardiffGrammarissimplerthantheSydneyGrammarinthattheformer"accommodatesthe''ergative''andthe''transitive''perspectivesWITHnASINGLEDESCRIPTIVEFRAMEWORK,SOrelievingthetextanalystofthetaskofdecidingwhichframeworktouseinwhichcases".
……
|
|